Rafael Doloso

Key highlights & details

• Implemented six conveyor-equipped pickup stations across two existing AGVs and configured transport routes for the revised arrangement.
• Adjusted Flow-code reverse-by-distance logic and station-button mounting to address pickup overshoot and pneumatic transfer activation.
• Ran repeated functional trials for station approach, positioning, trigger activation, and transfer behavior.
• Compared equal one-week periods of operational task records in Power BI and gathered informal operator feedback.
• Assisted technicians with troubleshooting optical inspection systems and SMD taping equipment.

Testing the revised workflow

Observed the original trolley-based setup for one week while waiting for materials. After implementing the six fixed pickup stations and adjusting the controls, tested and observed the revised setup for another week.

Power BI evaluation

Summarized daily dispatched, completed and incomplete tasks to compare the two equal observation periods. A completed task covered the entire transport cycle, including the return of the box. An incomplete task could mean the ICs had reached packing but the box return had failed.

Recorded task activity increased and incomplete transport cycles decreased in the observed periods. A task represented the full transport cycle, including box return. Internal records were not retained, so this comparison does not support numerical improvement or controlled causal claims.

Outcome

After satisfactory functional trials, the revised setup entered regular use. I then moved on to supporting technicians and equipment-engineering activities.

Operator feedback supported the assessment of the revised workflow’s reliability and practicality.

What I learned

Connected control logic with physical equipment, validated changes through repeated testing, and used operational data and operator feedback to evaluate the result.